The Nabea Al-Ajyal Foundation Press is committed to advancing high-quality scholarly communication. This Publishing Policy outlines the editorial standards, ethical guidelines, and procedural rules governing manuscript submission, review, and publication. Our policy is designed to ensure transparency, academic integrity, and the dissemination of rigorous, original research that aligns with our mission of fostering sustainable development, education advancement, and social empowerment.
1. Scope and Objectives
Overview:
This policy applies to all manuscripts submitted for publication through our platform. It covers original research, review articles, case studies, and other scholarly works. Our objective is to uphold a rigorous peer-review process that ensures the accuracy, relevance, and originality of all published content.
Mission Alignment:
In keeping with the vision of Nabaa Al-Ajyal Foundation Press, we are dedicated to providing a platform for innovative academic contributions that propel scientific inquiry, promote ethical research practices, and contribute to societal progress.
2. Editorial Process
Manuscript Evaluation:
All submissions undergo an initial screening by the editorial team to assess their fit with our journal’s scope and quality standards. Manuscripts that do not meet our criteria will be promptly returned to the authors with constructive feedback.
Decision Making:
Editorial decisions are based on a combination of reviewer recommendations, adherence to our formatting and ethical guidelines, and the overall significance of the research. The final decision rests with the editorial board, which operates with complete transparency and impartiality.
3. Peer Review Process
Double-Blind Review:
We employ a rigorous double-blind peer review process to maintain objectivity. Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the process, thereby ensuring that the evaluation is based solely on the scientific merit of the submission.
Reviewer Responsibilities:
Reviewers are expected to provide unbiased, constructive, and timely feedback. They must adhere to confidentiality agreements and declare any potential conflicts of interest before participating in the review process.
Timelines:
We strive to complete the peer review process within a reasonable timeframe. Authors will be informed of the progress and any delays that may occur during the evaluation of their manuscript.
4. Submission Guidelines
Eligibility and Format:
Manuscripts must be submitted in accordance with our standardized formatting guidelines, which include specified structure, citation styles, and word limits. All submissions should be in English and meet the criteria for originality and relevance.
Supporting Materials:
Authors are encouraged to provide supplementary materials, including data sets, figures, and multimedia, to support their research findings. All supplementary content must comply with ethical standards and copyright regulations.
5. Authorship and Contributions
Authorship Criteria:
All listed authors must have made a significant intellectual contribution to the work. Each submission should include a detailed description of individual contributions, ensuring accountability and transparency in the authorship process.
Acknowledgements:
Contributions that do not meet the criteria for authorship should be appropriately acknowledged. Funding sources, institutional support, and any potential conflicts of interest must be clearly disclosed.
6. Originality, Plagiarism, and Duplicate Submission
Original Work:
Submissions must represent original research that has not been published or simultaneously submitted elsewhere. Any overlap with previous publications must be clearly cited and justified.
Plagiarism Checks:
All manuscripts are subject to strict plagiarism detection protocols using industry-standard software. Manuscripts found to contain significant overlap or uncredited content will be rejected and may be subject to further ethical review.
7. Ethical Standards and Conflict of Interest
Research Ethics:
Authors must adhere to the highest ethical standards, including the proper treatment of human and animal subjects and the responsible reporting of research data. Ethical approval from relevant committees is required for studies involving sensitive research subjects.
Conflict of Interest:
All authors and reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. Full transparency in funding, affiliations, and personal relationships is mandatory to ensure unbiased research and review.
8. Data Availability and Reproducibility
Transparency in Data:
Authors should provide access to the data underlying their research findings wherever possible. This facilitates reproducibility and further scholarly inquiry. Any restrictions on data sharing must be clearly stated and justified.
Reproducibility:
We encourage submissions that promote replicable research methods and detailed methodological descriptions. Reproducibility is a cornerstone of scientific integrity and progress.
9. Corrections, Retractions, and Appeals
Post-Publication Corrections:
In the event of errors or inaccuracies, authors are obligated to promptly notify the editorial office. Corrections, errata, or retractions will be issued in accordance with best practices to maintain the integrity of the published record.
Appeals Process:
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing detailed justifications and supporting evidence. All appeals are reviewed by a designated committee to ensure fairness and transparency in the resolution process.
10. Copyright and Licensing
Author Rights and Licensing:
Upon acceptance, authors grant Nabaa Al-Ajyal Foundation Press the right to publish their work under a Creative Commons license, ensuring wide dissemination while protecting intellectual property rights. Authors retain the right to use their work for academic and research purposes.
Copyright Compliance:
All published content must comply with national and international copyright laws. Any third-party material included in the manuscript must have proper permissions and attributions.
11. Reviewer and Editor Responsibilities
Reviewer Conduct:
Reviewers are expected to conduct their assessments in a fair, unbiased, and timely manner. Any breach of confidentiality or misuse of privileged information will result in removal from the reviewer pool.
Editorial Accountability:
Editors are responsible for ensuring the integrity of the review process. They must manage conflicts of interest and maintain transparency in all editorial decisions, upholding the highest standards of academic integrity.
